<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- This sitemap was dynamically generated on April 3, 2026 at 4:24 pm by All in One SEO v4.9.1.1 - the original SEO plugin for WordPress. -->

<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://lsk-iplaw.com/default-sitemap.xsl"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Lempia Summerfield Katz</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Lempia Summerfield Katz]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Thu, 10 Jan 2019 17:44:29 +0000]]></lastBuildDate>
		<docs>https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html</docs>
		<atom:link href="https://lsk-iplaw.com/sitemap.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<ttl><![CDATA[60]]></ttl>

		<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/realtime-data-llc-v-iancu-decided-jan-10-2019-novelty/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/realtime-data-llc-v-iancu-decided-jan-10-2019-novelty/]]></link>
			<title>REALTIME DATA, LLC v. IANCU, decided Jan. 10, 2019, Novelty</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 10 Jan 2019 17:44:29 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/]]></link>
			<title>HOME</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 19 May 2014 14:32:55 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/sipco-llc-v-emerson-electric-co-decided-sept-25-2019-covered-business-method/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/sipco-llc-v-emerson-electric-co-decided-sept-25-2019-covered-business-method/]]></link>
			<title>SIPCO, LLC v. EMERSON ELECTRIC CO., decided Sept. 25, 2019, Covered Business Method</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:48:42 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/iridescent-networks-inc-v-att-mobility-llc-decided-august-12-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/iridescent-networks-inc-v-att-mobility-llc-decided-august-12-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></link>
			<title>IRIDESCENT NETWORKS, INC. v. AT&amp;T MOBILITY, LLC, decided August 12, 2019, Claim Interpretation</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Aug 2019 17:03:03 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/solutran-inc-v-elavon-inc-decided-july-30-2019-statutory-subject-matter/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/solutran-inc-v-elavon-inc-decided-july-30-2019-statutory-subject-matter/]]></link>
			<title>SOLUTRAN, INC. v. ELAVON, INC., decided July 30, 2019, Statutory Subject Matter</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:43:01 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/guangdong-alison-hi-tech-co-v-itc-decided-august-27-2019-indefiniteness/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/guangdong-alison-hi-tech-co-v-itc-decided-august-27-2019-indefiniteness/]]></link>
			<title>GUANGDONG ALISON HI-TECH CO. v. ITC, decided August 27, 2019, Indefiniteness</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 Aug 2019 16:36:41 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/bios/support-team/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/bios/support-team/]]></link>
			<title>Support Team</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 25 Jul 2023 20:29:43 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/allergan-sales-llc-v-sandoz-inc-decided-august-29-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/allergan-sales-llc-v-sandoz-inc-decided-august-29-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></link>
			<title>ALLERGAN SALES, LLC v. SANDOZ, INC., decided August 29, 2019, Claim Interpretation</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 29 Aug 2019 16:50:33 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/mtd-prods-inc-v-iancu-decided-august-12-2019-means-plus-function/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/mtd-prods-inc-v-iancu-decided-august-12-2019-means-plus-function/]]></link>
			<title>MTD PRODS. INC. v. IANCU, decided August 12, 2019, Means-Plus-Function</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 15 Aug 2019 16:47:56 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/american-axle-manufacturing-v-neapco-holdings-decided-october-3-2019-statutory-subject-matter/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/american-axle-manufacturing-v-neapco-holdings-decided-october-3-2019-statutory-subject-matter/]]></link>
			<title>AMERICAN AXLE &amp; MANUFACTURING v. NEAPCO HOLDINGS, decided October 3, 2019, Statutory Subject Matter</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Oct 2019 16:47:19 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/amgen-inc-v-coherus-biosciences-inc-decided-july-29-2019-arguement-based-estoppel/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/amgen-inc-v-coherus-biosciences-inc-decided-july-29-2019-arguement-based-estoppel/]]></link>
			<title>AMGEN, INC. v. COHERUS BIOSCIENCES INC., decided July 29, 2019, Arguement-based Estoppel</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:47:28 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/chamberlain-group-inc-v-techtronic-industries-co-ltd-decided-august-21-2019-statutory-subject-matter/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/chamberlain-group-inc-v-techtronic-industries-co-ltd-decided-august-21-2019-statutory-subject-matter/]]></link>
			<title>CHAMBERLAIN GROUP, INC. v. TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES CO. LTD., decided August 21, 2019, Statutory Subject Matter</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 26 Aug 2019 16:45:06 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/samsung-electronics-co-ltd-v-infobridge-pte-ltd-decided-july-12-2019-public-access/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/samsung-electronics-co-ltd-v-infobridge-pte-ltd-decided-july-12-2019-public-access/]]></link>
			<title>SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. v. INFOBRIDGE PTE. LTD., decided July 12, 2019, Public Access</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 16 Jul 2019 16:41:51 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/quest-integrity-usa-llc-v-cokebusters-usa-inc-decided-may-21-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/quest-integrity-usa-llc-v-cokebusters-usa-inc-decided-may-21-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></link>
			<title>QUEST INTEGRITY USA, LLC v. COKEBUSTERS USA INC., decided May 21, 2019, Claim Interpretation</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 21 May 2019 17:01:08 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/contact/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/contact/]]></link>
			<title>Contact &#038; Recruiting</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 17 Oct 2022 19:51:09 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/quake-v-lo-decided-july-10-2010-written-description/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/quake-v-lo-decided-july-10-2010-written-description/]]></link>
			<title>QUAKE v. LO, decided July 10, 2010, Written Description</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 11 Jul 2019 16:44:02 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/trading-technologies-intl-v-ibg-llc-decided-april-30-2019-statutory-subject-matter/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/trading-technologies-intl-v-ibg-llc-decided-april-30-2019-statutory-subject-matter/]]></link>
			<title>TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INT’L v. IBG LLC, decided April 30, 2019, Statutory Subject Matter</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 30 Apr 2019 17:09:37 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/tq-delta-llc-v-dish-network-llc-decided-july-10-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/tq-delta-llc-v-dish-network-llc-decided-july-10-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></link>
			<title>TQ DELTA, LLC. v. DISH NETWORK LLC, decided July 10, 2019, Claim Interpretation</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 15 Jul 2019 16:54:30 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/bradium-technologies-llc-v-iancu-decided-may-13-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/bradium-technologies-llc-v-iancu-decided-may-13-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></link>
			<title>BRADIUM TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. IANCU, decided May 13, 2019, Claim Interpretation</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 15 May 2019 17:08:51 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/eko-brands-llc-v-adrian-rivera-maynez-enters-decided-january-13-2020-claim-interpretation/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/eko-brands-llc-v-adrian-rivera-maynez-enters-decided-january-13-2020-claim-interpretation/]]></link>
			<title>EKO BRANDS, LLC v. ADRIAN RIVERA MAYNEZ ENTERS., decided January 13, 2020, Claim Interpretation</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 13 Jan 2020 17:53:57 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/btg-internation-limited-v-amneal-pharmaceuticals-llc-decided-may-14-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/btg-internation-limited-v-amneal-pharmaceuticals-llc-decided-may-14-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></link>
			<title>BTG INTERNATION LIMITED v. AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC, decided May 14, 2019, Claim Interpretation</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 15 May 2019 17:38:14 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/bios/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/bios/]]></link>
			<title>Bios</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 08 Aug 2022 20:44:23 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/cellspin-soft-inc-v-fitbit-inc-decided-june-25-2019-statutory-subject-matter/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/cellspin-soft-inc-v-fitbit-inc-decided-june-25-2019-statutory-subject-matter/]]></link>
			<title>CELLSPIN SOFT, INC. v. FITBIT, INC., decided June 25, 2019, Statutory Subject Matter</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:57:48 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/samsung-electronics-co-ltd-v-elm-3d-innovations-llc-decided-june-12-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/samsung-electronics-co-ltd-v-elm-3d-innovations-llc-decided-june-12-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></link>
			<title>SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. v. ELM 3D INNOVATIONS, LLC, decided June 12, 2019, Claim Interpretation</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Jun 2019 17:13:58 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/ucb-inc-v-watson-laboratories-inc-decided-june-24-2019-equivalents/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/ucb-inc-v-watson-laboratories-inc-decided-june-24-2019-equivalents/]]></link>
			<title>UCB, INC. v. WATSON LABORATORIES INC., decided June 24, 2019, Equivalents</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 25 Jun 2019 17:09:06 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/amgen-inc-v-sandoz-inc-decided-may-8-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/amgen-inc-v-sandoz-inc-decided-may-8-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></link>
			<title>AMGEN INC. v. SANDOZ INC., decided May 8, 2019, Claim Interpretation</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 09 May 2019 17:39:27 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/game-and-tech-co-ltd-v-activision-blizzard-inc-decided-june-21-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/game-and-tech-co-ltd-v-activision-blizzard-inc-decided-june-21-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></link>
			<title>GAME AND TECH. CO., LTD. v. ACTIVISION BLIZZARD INC.,  decided June 21, 2019, Claim Interpretation</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:01:32 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/nuvo-pharmaceuticals-v-dr-reddys-laboratories-decided-may-15-2019-written-description/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/nuvo-pharmaceuticals-v-dr-reddys-laboratories-decided-may-15-2019-written-description/]]></link>
			<title>NUVO PHARMACEUTICALS v. DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES, decided May 15, 2019, Written Description</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 20 May 2019 16:57:49 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/forum-us-inc-v-flow-valve-llc-decided-june-17-2019-reissue-claiming/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/forum-us-inc-v-flow-valve-llc-decided-june-17-2019-reissue-claiming/]]></link>
			<title>FORUM US, INC. v. FLOW VALVE, LLC, decided June 17, 2019, Reissue Claiming</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 17 Jun 2019 16:43:16 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/cisco-systems-inc-v-tq-delta-llc-decided-july-10-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/cisco-systems-inc-v-tq-delta-llc-decided-july-10-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></link>
			<title>CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. v. TQ DELTA, LLC., decided July 10, 2019, Claim Interpretation</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 15 Jul 2019 16:53:51 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/trading-technologies-intl-v-ibg-llc-decided-april-18-2019-statutory-subject-matter/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/trading-technologies-intl-v-ibg-llc-decided-april-18-2019-statutory-subject-matter/]]></link>
			<title>TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INT’L v. IBG LLC, decided April 18, 2019, Statutory Subject Matter</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 18 Apr 2019 16:49:12 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/in-re-global-ip-holdings-llc-decided-july-5-2019-written-description/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/in-re-global-ip-holdings-llc-decided-july-5-2019-written-description/]]></link>
			<title>IN RE: GLOBAL IP HOLDINGS LLC, decided July 5, 2019, Written Description</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 08 Jul 2019 16:50:13 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/arctic-cat-inc-v-gep-power-products-inc-decided-march-26-2019-preamble-limitation/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/arctic-cat-inc-v-gep-power-products-inc-decided-march-26-2019-preamble-limitation/]]></link>
			<title>ARCTIC CAT INC., v. GEP POWER PRODUCTS, INC., decided March 26, 2019, Preamble Limitation</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 27 Mar 2019 16:56:27 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/sri-intl-inc-v-cisco-sys-inc-decided-march-20-2019-statutory-subject-matter/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/sri-intl-inc-v-cisco-sys-inc-decided-march-20-2019-statutory-subject-matter/]]></link>
			<title>SRI INT’L, INC. v. CISCO SYS., INC., decided March 20, 2019, Statutory Subject Matter</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 20 Mar 2019 16:49:00 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/e-i-du-pont-de-nemours-co-v-unifrax-i-llc-decided-april-17-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/e-i-du-pont-de-nemours-co-v-unifrax-i-llc-decided-april-17-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></link>
			<title>E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS &amp; CO. v. UNIFRAX I LLC, decided April 17, 2019, Claim Interpretation</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 17 Apr 2019 16:57:45 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/university-of-fl-research-foundation-v-general-electric-co-decided-feb-26-2019-statutory-subject-matter/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/university-of-fl-research-foundation-v-general-electric-co-decided-feb-26-2019-statutory-subject-matter/]]></link>
			<title>UNIVERSITY OF FL RESEARCH FOUNDATION v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., decided Feb. 26, 2019, Statutory Subject Matter</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 26 Feb 2019 18:00:33 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/chargepoint-inc-v-semaconnect-inc-decided-march-28-2019-statutory-subject-matter/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/chargepoint-inc-v-semaconnect-inc-decided-march-28-2019-statutory-subject-matter/]]></link>
			<title>CHARGEPOINT, INC. v. SEMACONNECT, INC., decided March 28, 2019, Statutory Subject Matter</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:03:54 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/elbit-systems-land-and-c4i-ltd-v-hughes-network-systems-llc-decided-june-25-2019-means-plus-function/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/elbit-systems-land-and-c4i-ltd-v-hughes-network-systems-llc-decided-june-25-2019-means-plus-function/]]></link>
			<title>ELBIT SYSTEMS LAND AND C4I LTD v. HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC, decided June 25, 2019, Means-plus-function</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:47:14 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/forest-laboratories-llc-v-sigmapharm-laboratories-llc-decided-march-14-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/forest-laboratories-llc-v-sigmapharm-laboratories-llc-decided-march-14-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></link>
			<title>FOREST LABORATORIES, LLC v. SIGMAPHARM LABORATORIES, LLC, decided March 14, 2019, Claim Interpretation</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 14 Mar 2019 16:56:49 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/athena-diagnostics-v-mayo-collaborative-services-decided-feb-6-2019-stutory-sujbect-matter/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/athena-diagnostics-v-mayo-collaborative-services-decided-feb-6-2019-stutory-sujbect-matter/]]></link>
			<title>ATHENA DIAGNOSTICS v. MAYO COLLABORATIVE SERVICES, decided Feb. 6, 2019, Stutory Sujbect Matter</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 07 Feb 2019 18:41:01 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/neptune-generics-llc-v-eli-lilly-company-decided-april-26-2019-obviousness/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/neptune-generics-llc-v-eli-lilly-company-decided-april-26-2019-obviousness/]]></link>
			<title>NEPTUNE GENERICS, LLC v. ELI LILLY &amp; COMPANY, decided April 26, 2019, Obviousness</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 29 Apr 2019 17:01:36 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/personal-web-technologies-llc-v-apple-inc-decided-march-8-2019-obviousness/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/personal-web-technologies-llc-v-apple-inc-decided-march-8-2019-obviousness/]]></link>
			<title>PERSONAL WEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. APPLE, INC., decided March 8, 2019, Obviousness</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:10:33 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/continental-circuits-llc-v-intel-corp-decided-feb-8-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/continental-circuits-llc-v-intel-corp-decided-feb-8-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></link>
			<title>CONTINENTAL CIRCUITS LLC v. INTEL CORP., decided Feb. 8, 2019, Claim Interpretation</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 11 Feb 2019 17:39:49 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/omega-patents-llc-v-calamp-corp-decided-april-8-2019-infringement/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/omega-patents-llc-v-calamp-corp-decided-april-8-2019-infringement/]]></link>
			<title>OMEGA PATENTS, LLC v. CALAMP CORP., decided April 8, 2019, Infringement</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 08 Apr 2019 17:24:42 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/duncan-parking-technologies-v-ips-group-inc-decided-january-31-2019-anticipation-based-on-inventorship-and-infringement/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/duncan-parking-technologies-v-ips-group-inc-decided-january-31-2019-anticipation-based-on-inventorship-and-infringement/]]></link>
			<title>DUNCAN PARKING TECHNOLOGIES v. IPS GROUP, INC., decided January 31, 2019, Anticipation based on Inventorship and Infringement</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 04 Feb 2019 18:00:55 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/tek-global-s-r-l-v-sealant-systems-international-decided-march-29-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/tek-global-s-r-l-v-sealant-systems-international-decided-march-29-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></link>
			<title>TEK GLOBAL, S.R.L. v. SEALANT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, decided March 29, 2019, Claim Interpretation</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 01 Apr 2019 18:16:19 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/natural-alternatives-intl-v-creative-compounds-llc-decided-march-15-2019-statutory-subject-matter/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/natural-alternatives-intl-v-creative-compounds-llc-decided-march-15-2019-statutory-subject-matter/]]></link>
			<title>NATURAL ALTERNATIVES INTL. v. CREATIVE COMPOUNDS, LLC, decided March 15, 2019, Statutory Subject Matter</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:51:59 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/barry-v-medtronic-inc-decided-january-24-2019-public-use-and-on-sale-bars/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/barry-v-medtronic-inc-decided-january-24-2019-public-use-and-on-sale-bars/]]></link>
			<title>BARRY v. MEDTRONIC, INC., decided January 24, 2019, Public Use and On-Sale Bars</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 24 Jan 2019 18:09:57 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/sony-corp-v-iancu-decided-may-22-2019-means-plus-function/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/sony-corp-v-iancu-decided-may-22-2019-means-plus-function/]]></link>
			<title>SONY CORP. v. IANCU, decided May 22, 2019, Means-Plus-Function</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 31 May 2019 16:43:48 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/endo-pharm-inc-v-actavis-llc-decided-may-3-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://lsk-iplaw.com/endo-pharm-inc-v-actavis-llc-decided-may-3-2019-claim-interpretation/]]></link>
			<title>ENDO PHARM. INC. v. ACTAVIS LLC, decided May 3, 2019, Claim Interpretation</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 06 May 2019 16:46:52 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
				</channel>
</rss>
