Monthly Archives: April 2019

TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INT’L v. IBG LLC, decided April 30, 2019, Statutory Subject Matter

U.S. Patent No. 7,784,556 is directed to display of market information (profit and loss) on a screen for electronic trading (pages 2-4). The claims do not solve a technical problem with a technical solution, so were properly subjected to covered business method (CBM) review (pages 6-7).  Providing new information in an existing screen is not […]

NEPTUNE GENERICS, LLC v. ELI LILLY & COMPANY, decided April 26, 2019, Obviousness

U.S. Patent No. 7,772,209 is directed to administering folic acid and a methylmalonic acid lowering agent before pemetrexed disodium (pages 2-4). The PTAB held that the claims were not obvious over multiple references as none of the references taught using methylmalonic acid lowering agent with the known folic acid to pre-treat (pages 4-5). Evidence supported […]

TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INT’L v. IBG LLC, decided April 18, 2019, Statutory Subject Matter

U.S. Patent Nos. 7,533,056, 7,212,999, and 7,904,374 are directed to graphical user interfaces (UI) for electronic trading (pages 3-4). The following generalizes between various of the patents. The patents are not directed to a technological invention, so were properly subjected to covered business method (CBM) review (pages 4-13).  The invention is the display of information […]

E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO. v. UNIFRAX I LLC, decided April 17, 2019, Claim Interpretation

U.S. Patent No. 8,607,926 is directed to a composite flame barrier laminate for a blanket (page 2). The claim recites three layers where one layer comprises platelets in an amount of 100% by weight (page 3). The parties dispute whether the “100% by weight” allows for any residual dispersant due to incomplete drying (page 5). […]

OMEGA PATENTS, LLC v. CALAMP CORP., decided April 8, 2019, Infringement

U.S. Patent Nos. 6,346,876; 6,756,885; 7,671,727; and 8,032,278 are directed to remote control or monitoring of vehicle functions of multiple vehicles (page 2).   CalAmp sells the transmitter and receiver in the vehicle but not the transmitter and receiver on a cell tower for system claims, so there is no direct infringement (page 9).  Hindsight: At […]

TEK GLOBAL, S.R.L. v. SEALANT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, decided March 29, 2019, Claim Interpretation

U.S. Patent No. 7,789,110 is directed to an emergency kit for repairing vehicle tires deflated by puncture (pages 2-3).   The claims recite “conduits connecting the container” and “container connecting conduit” where conduit is alleged to be a mean-plus-function limitation (pages 10-11).  The connected elements are definite structure (pages 11-12).  The dependent claims further limit “conduit” […]